home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
The Internet Professor
/
The Internet Professor.iso
/
knowodys
/
document
/
intranet.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1997-02-01
|
6KB
|
97 lines
(This is from the March 1996 on-line companion to Russ Haynal's monthly
column in "Enterprise Reengineering", The National Publication for BPR.)
Understanding the Intranet
"Internet", "intranet", what's the difference? By now, you should be well
aware that the Internet is the world's biggest collection of inter-connected
networks. Through the Internet, organizations are receiving and sending
information all over the planet.
It seems that the Internet's open protocols and applications have proven
to be universally useful over a mixture of networks, server platforms and
workstations. That sounds an awful lot like most like most enterprise-wide
networks.
We've all seen organizations trying to integrate their diverse collection
of computing resources. We also know that this can be quite a challenging
task for most organizations. On the server side, there is a significant
investment in legacy systems and many flavors of Unix solutions. For the
client workstations, you have Windows and Mac advocates each pushing for
their workstations.
With all this diversity, how are organizations going to build a cohesive
information infrastructure?
This is where the Internet's technology shines. Intranet is the latest
term to describe when the Internet's protocols and applications are used,
not for accessing the vast resources on the Internet, but for moving information
within an organization's boundaries. Intranet is an explosive new market segment,
estimated by industry sources to be $1.2 billion by 1997.
Most BPR activities quantify an organization's workflows, and identify customers
and suppliers which may be external or internal to the organization. Companies
who have focused on using the Internet for external purposes, are now realizing
that these same applications can also be used internally. Almost all the
organizations I have worked with are making significant amounts of information
available through internal web pages.
To get a sense of what companies are doing, a good starting point is Netscape's
At Work page, http://www.netscape.com/comprod/at_work/index.html, which will
lead you to press clippings about Intranets and Netscape's Customer Profiles
page. Here you can learn how companies such as Eli Lilly, Mobil, and Sandia
National Laboratories use web-based intranets for a variety of applications.
For example, AT&T has built a variety of internal web sites for billing systems,
library services and office supply ordering. One of their most popular sites is
POST, their employee phone book. AT&T already had an employee information database,
but adding a web interface has caused it to be more widely used throughout the
company. Using POST, employees can find complete contact information for fellow
employees including their relationship to the organizations' structure.
Sandia National Laboratories has developed an extensive intranet with every major
department having its own home page. Sandia has a diverse set of server platforms
and client workstations. It was this diversity in operating systems that made a
web-based solution so attractive, because the web servers and clients ran on
all different platforms.
Many large organizations are also copying the Internet's mechanisms to organize
their large collection of internal web sites. Some organizations have Yahoo-style
indexes (complete with announcement/ registration forms) so that employees can
more easily publicize and find each other's pages.
These intranets may sound good, but how do they relate to existing groupware
infrastructure and development activities? There are two phenomena occurring
simultaneously. Traditional groupware applications are becoming web-capable,
and web technology is rapidly expanding to incorporate traditional groupware
functions.
Almost every major vendor from IBM, Novell and Oracle are making sure that
their products support web protocols. This inclusion of web functionality
is occurring on both the server and client side of most major groupware
applications. Oracle, for example has released it's own web browsers called
PowerBrowser and WebServer - both with strong support for Oracle's databases.
IBM/Lotus' InterNotes Web Publisher automatically publishes Notes documents
and forms to the Web, translates them to HTML and captures information from
forms submitted via the Web - incorporating it into Notes applications.
Meanwhile, the leader of the Internet web, Netscapecontinues to expand rapidly
into traditional groupware functions. Netscape has acquired Collabra Software,
and will be integrating Collabra's electronic-forum software with Netscape's
Navigator. Other conferencing mechanisms like Hypernews are also becoming widely
used join the functionality of Usenet news groups into web pages.
Web technology and proprietary groupware applications have been complimentary
in their uses. As each camp expands into the other's territory, the competition
will increase. Competition is usually a good thing, as evidenced by the recent
price reductions in Lotus Notes.
Which approach will win? I am not foolish enough to pick sides on this one :-)
This topic has been the subject of debate newsgroups such as
comp.groupware.lotus-notes.misc (be sure to look at their FAQ). By the way, if
any of you are working on web development activities, the best online resource
is the Web Developer's Library at http://www.stars.com/Vlib.